Files
swarm-house/docs/05-network-security.md
T
eSlider 57e48e0b55 docs: on-prem data platform proposal for autonomous drone swarms
Problem statement, on-board architecture, Parquet/DuckDB storage design,
swarm sync strategy, zero-trust networking, environments, observability,
CI/CD delivery with fleet release manifests, roadmap and open questions.
2026-07-08 13:03:23 +01:00

3.5 KiB

05 — Network & security

Zero trust, fully air-gapped, everything provisioned before wheels-up.

Trust model

  • Nothing joins the swarm at runtime. Every device receives its identity (key pair + certificate) during ground provisioning, signed by the fleet's offline CA. There is no trust-on-first-use, no runtime enrollment endpoint, no exception path.
  • Network position grants nothing. Being inside the mesh does not authorize anything; every connection authenticates mutually.
  • Two layers of cryptography, by design:
    1. WireGuard mesh overlay — every drone holds the public keys of every fleet member (distributed at provisioning). All swarm traffic runs inside these tunnels; a device without a provisioned key cannot even complete a handshake.
    2. mTLS between services — inside the overlay, service-to-service calls (query API, MinIO replication) present per-service certificates from the fleet PKI. Compromising the network layer alone still yields nothing readable.
graph TB
    subgraph ground [Ground provisioning, before deployment]
        CA["offline fleet CA"]
        PROV["provisioning station"]
        CA -->|"sign device + service certs"| PROV
    end
    subgraph mesh [In-flight ad-hoc mesh]
        A["drone A<br/>wg key + certs"]
        B["drone B<br/>wg key + certs"]
        C["drone C<br/>wg key + certs"]
        A <-->|"WireGuard + mTLS"| B
        B <-->|"WireGuard + mTLS"| C
        A <-->|"WireGuard + mTLS"| C
    end
    PROV -->|"per-device identity, peer list"| A
    PROV --> B
    PROV --> C

Radio reality

  • Transport is assumed to be ad-hoc Wi-Fi class (2.4/5 GHz), with channel hopping expected. The platform treats the link as lossy, variable, and adversarial — all sync mechanisms already tolerate partitions (04).
  • RSSI is data. Per-peer signal strength is captured into telemetry like any other sensor — it feeds relative-positioning estimates and post-flight link-quality analysis, and it is free.
  • Electromagnetic environment sensing (whatever the radio can observe) is likewise recorded — cheap in flight, valuable in replay.

Key lifecycle

Phase Action
Fleet build Offline CA generates device identities; keys injected at provisioning, never transmitted over any network
Mission prep Peer lists and certificates refreshed as part of the fleet release bundle (11)
Rotation Standard cadence between missions; emergency rotation = new fleet release
Loss of a drone Its keys are revoked in the next release; mesh peers drop the revoked identity at the next mission load. Data-at-rest exposure is bounded by NVMe encryption (below)

Data at rest

  • On-board NVMe is encrypted (LUKS) with keys held in the device's secure element / TPM where the hardware provides one; the disk alone is unreadable.
  • The ground warehouse applies standard at-rest encryption plus role-based access; it is the single most valuable asset in the system (every flight ever flown).

Attack surface, deliberately shortened

  • The dev/debug plane does not exist in production builds (02) — not firewalled, absent.
  • No inbound listeners except the authenticated mesh services; no management SSH in production radio profiles (bench access is wired, at the dock).
  • Images are scanned (Trivy) and signed in CI; drones verify signatures against the pinned digests in the fleet release manifest before running anything (11).