docs: default caveman style for issues, PRs, and reviews
CI & Release / Verify documentation (push) Skipped
CI & Release / Verify simulator (push) Skipped
CI & Release / Trivy scan (push) Skipped
CI & Release / Semantic Release (push) Skipped
CI & Release / Verify documentation (pull_request) Successful in 5s
CI & Release / Verify simulator (pull_request) Failing after 9s
CI & Release / Trivy scan (pull_request) Skipped
CI & Release / Semantic Release (pull_request) Skipped

Document caveman-full as the collaboration voice in AGENTS and CONTRIBUTING,
and add Gitea issue/PR templates that pre-fill terse structure.
This commit is contained in:
2026-07-10 10:56:13 +01:00
parent e6e57843cb
commit bed6f93626
6 changed files with 110 additions and 0 deletions
+8
View File
@@ -0,0 +1,8 @@
blank_issues_enabled: false
contact_links:
- name: Design docs
url: https://git.produktor.io/eSlider/swarm-house/src/branch/main/docs/12-design-journey.md
about: Start with the design journey, then open an issue here.
- name: Open questions
url: https://git.produktor.io/eSlider/swarm-house/src/branch/main/docs/09-open-questions.md
about: Known unknowns — check before duplicating.
+24
View File
@@ -0,0 +1,24 @@
---
name: Change / task
about: Default issue template — caveman style
title: ""
labels: []
---
Write **caveman-full**: short lines, fragments OK, no filler. See [`CONTRIBUTING.md`](../../CONTRIBUTING.md#caveman-style-default).
## What
<!-- One line. What need fix or build. -->
## Why
<!-- Problem or goal. Skip if obvious from title. -->
## Done when
- [ ]
## Notes
<!-- Links, ADR, open question §. Optional. -->
+19
View File
@@ -0,0 +1,19 @@
Write **caveman-full** by default. See [`CONTRIBUTING.md`](../CONTRIBUTING.md#caveman-style-default).
## What
<!-- What changed. Bullets OK. -->
## Why
<!-- Problem this fixes or design gap closed. -->
## Test
- [ ] `pytest tests/ -q` (if code touched)
- [ ] `python scripts/check_docs.py` (if docs touched)
- [ ] ADR added if boundary/contract changed
## Links
<!-- Closes / Relates to #issue. Optional demo URL. -->
+17
View File
@@ -24,6 +24,23 @@ See [`CONTRIBUTING.md`](CONTRIBUTING.md) for the development workflow and TDD re
## Conventions
### Caveman style (default for collaboration)
**Issues, pull requests, and code reviews** use **caveman-full** by default:
- Short sentences or fragments; drop articles and filler when clear
- Lead with fact, verdict, or ask — not preamble
- Bullets over paragraphs; one idea per line
- Keep technical terms, acronyms, paths, and code exact
- English only; no identifying references (same as all repo prose)
README tiers: root [`README.md`](README.md) = **caveman-lite** (full sentences, less filler);
component READMEs = **caveman-full**. Design docs in `docs/` stay readable prose unless
editing for consistency.
Templates: [`.github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/`](.github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/),
[`.github/pull_request_template.md`](.github/pull_request_template.md).
- Markdown: ATX headings, fenced code blocks with language tags, pipe tables.
- Python: PEP 8, type hints, pure functions where possible, no unnecessary classes.
- TypeScript: strict mode, functional components and hooks, no extra UI libraries.
+35
View File
@@ -77,6 +77,41 @@ test: cover broadcast frame roundtrip
Never include AI tool references, `Co-authored-by` trailers for assistants, or
identifying names of people, companies, or locations.
## Caveman style (default)
Use **caveman-full** in **issues**, **pull requests**, and **reviews** unless the
author explicitly asks otherwise.
| Do | Skip |
| --- | --- |
| Short lines, fragments OK | Long preamble ("I wanted to start by saying…") |
| Lead with what / why / verdict | Filler ("just", "basically", "kind of") |
| Bullets, checklists | Repeated context already in diff or issue |
| Exact terms, paths, code | Invented abbreviations or vague "the thing" |
**Examples**
| Fluffy | Caveman |
| --- | --- |
| I think we should probably consider adding a link checker to CI because links might break. | Add CI link checker. Broken relative links fail merge. |
| This pull request implements the documentation improvements that were discussed in the audit. | Docs audit: glossary T0T4, fix ground README link, rsync wording. |
| LGTM but maybe we could think about whether the anchor format is consistent? | Merge OK. Fix glossary anchors in follow-up (#1). |
README intensity: root = caveman-lite; `simulator/`, `prototype/`, `infra/`, `docs/adr/` READMEs =
caveman-full. Numbered design docs in `docs/` stay full prose.
Gitea pre-fills [issue](.github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/default.md) and
[PR](.github/pull_request_template.md) templates with this style.
### Reviews
Default review voice = caveman-full:
1. **Verdict first** — merge / wait / no, or approve / request changes
2. **Findings** — bullet per blocker or nit; file + line when useful
3. **Scope** — say if issue AC met, partial, or out of scope
4. No essay; link ADR, issue, or doc section instead of restating design
## Pull request checklist
- [ ] Tests added or updated; `pytest tests/ -q` passes locally
+7
View File
@@ -6,6 +6,13 @@ Point-in-time audits and follow-up work for links, terminology, readability, and
| --- | --- | --- |
| [2026-07-10 audit](2026-07-10-audit.md) | 2026-07-10 | Full `docs/` + README pass; glossary T0T4; live demo links |
## Collaboration style
Issues, PRs, and reviews default to **caveman-full** ([`CONTRIBUTING.md`](../../CONTRIBUTING.md#caveman-style-default),
[`AGENTS.md`](../../AGENTS.md#caveman-style-default-for-collaboration)). Gitea templates live under
[`.github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/`](../../.github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/) and
[`.github/pull_request_template.md`](../../.github/pull_request_template.md).
## CI automation
Enforced in Gitea Actions (`docs-verify` job). Rules live in [`scripts/docs_rules.yaml`](../../scripts/docs_rules.yaml); see [ci-rules.md](ci-rules.md).