Compare commits
1
Commits
| Author | SHA1 | Date | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
|
168a0a3b53 |
@@ -48,7 +48,7 @@ bin/postgres/ query.go (read-only YAML)
|
||||
bin/git/ import.go (go-git history; Python shim execs it)
|
||||
bin/web/ search.go (SearXNG; Python shim execs it)
|
||||
bin/reasoner/ bakeoff.go (D18 CPU OpenAI tool-call bake-off)
|
||||
internal/ shared Go (brain/rank is cgo-free; facts D16; chats; gitlog; websearch; reasoner; duckstats)
|
||||
internal/ shared Go (brain/rank is cgo-free; chats parsers; gitlog; websearch; reasoner; duckstats)
|
||||
bin/qa/ stats.go (DuckDB quantiles / JSONL count; gcc CGO, not Zig)
|
||||
bin/watch/ corpus watcher (used by bin/brain/watch.go)
|
||||
bin/tools/ vendored python libs behind bin/* (kblib, yamlout, websearch)
|
||||
@@ -84,7 +84,7 @@ bin/brain/index.go --rebuild --with-facts --with-chats
|
||||
## Tools
|
||||
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
bin/facts/audit.go ["self"|"db"|"contradict"] # 2-source + D16 adjudication
|
||||
bin/facts/audit.go ["self"|"facts"|"info"|"stale"] # 2-source + staleness gate
|
||||
bin/facts/crm.go [--dry-run] # proof person↔company/company↔project (ooCRM × corpus SoT)
|
||||
bin/kb/search "query" [--repo X] # deprecated wrapper → bin/brain/search.go
|
||||
bin/brain/search.go "query" [--root facts|info] # deduction search → YAML
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -5,10 +5,8 @@ RAG over the operational Brain/ops/eSlider stack. Built like Sherlock
|
||||
Holmes: nothing is asserted unless it has proof.
|
||||
|
||||
Status: **v1 in** (epic [#16](https://git.produktor.io/eSlider/2dph/issues/16) closed).
|
||||
v2 board: milestone [v2](https://git.produktor.io/eSlider/2dph/milestone/13) —
|
||||
OCR [#6](https://git.produktor.io/eSlider/2dph/issues/6) in,
|
||||
[#29](https://git.produktor.io/eSlider/2dph/issues/29) OQ1 in,
|
||||
[#30](https://git.produktor.io/eSlider/2dph/issues/30) OQ3 in.
|
||||
v2 board: milestone [v2](https://git.produktor.io/eSlider/2dph/milestone/13) — OCR [#6](https://git.produktor.io/eSlider/2dph/issues/6),
|
||||
[#29](https://git.produktor.io/eSlider/2dph/issues/29) OQ1, [#30](https://git.produktor.io/eSlider/2dph/issues/30) OQ3.
|
||||
Gap: [docs/roadmap.md](docs/roadmap.md).
|
||||
|
||||
## What
|
||||
@@ -44,7 +42,7 @@ detective method: **a fact needs ≥2 independent sources or it is
|
||||
| D13 | portfolio | start graph `(Person:eslider)-[:HAS]->(Portfolio)`, associate other natural/juristic persons later. |
|
||||
| D14 | tooling style | `bin/{subject}/{method}.go` shebang (e.g. `bin/brain/search.go`). Shared code in `internal/`. One root `go.mod` + `go.work`. No `bin/*/main.go`, no nested modules. |
|
||||
| D15 | repo | Gitea [`eSlider/2dph`](https://git.produktor.io/eSlider/2dph) is origin + [issues](https://git.produktor.io/eSlider/2dph/issues). GitHub `eSlider/2dph` is the public clone (PRs + Actions CI). No direct `main` pushes. TDD → PR → CI green → merge. |
|
||||
| D16 | contradictions | ≥2 yes vs ≥2 no → hypothesis → `(not confirmed)` until a rule fires. Order: **temporal_freshness** (fresh ≥2 vs stale minority), then **authority_pairing** (runtime/config A×B beats narrative C). Store as `a x b vs c x d` on hypothesis leafs. `bin/facts/audit contradict`. [#29](https://git.produktor.io/eSlider/2dph/issues/29). |
|
||||
| D16 | contradictions | ≥2 yes vs ≥2 no → unrelated sources conflict → hypothesis → `(not confirmed)`. Resolution (authority, staleness adjudication) = **v2**, tracked as open question. |
|
||||
| D17 | assertion gate | Fact-check every *claim* (facts → info → live → web), not every edit. `bin/brain/search.go` adds a `web` block when there is no facts hit (`throttled`/`skipped`/`refused` ≠ absence). `--root` and `--no-web` stay local. Missing graph ≠ “does not exist”. |
|
||||
| D18 | reasoner | Pluggable OpenAI-compatible URL (`REASONER_BASE_URL`). RAM: `Qwen/Qwen3.5-9B`. Quality: `prism-ml/Bonsai-27B-gguf` or `Qwen/Qwen3.6-27B`. No official Qwen3.6-9B. CPU bake-off: `bin/reasoner/bakeoff.go` + compose profile `reasoner` (`OLLAMA_NUM_GPU=0`, `:11435`). PicoClaw is compose profile `picoclaw`; tools are `search`/`get`/`audit`. Weights are not copied into the 2dph image. Agent lever/loop: [#15](https://git.produktor.io/eSlider/2dph/issues/15). |
|
||||
| D19 | git history | [go-git](https://github.com/go-git/go-git) via `bin/git/import.go`. No subprocess of the git binary. Conversion prints commit leafs; brain write is `bin/brain/index.go`. |
|
||||
@@ -119,8 +117,8 @@ Common props on every node/edge: `root`, `confidence`, `evidence[]`, `how`,
|
||||
|
||||
## Open questions (v2)
|
||||
|
||||
- OQ1: **in** — D16 adjudication: `temporal_freshness` then `authority_pairing`.
|
||||
Unresolved 2v2 stays hypothesis. [#29](https://git.produktor.io/eSlider/2dph/issues/29).
|
||||
- OQ1: mutually-contradicting evidence — how to resolve (authority weighting,
|
||||
temporal freshness, audit adjudication). **v2**; [#29](https://git.produktor.io/eSlider/2dph/issues/29).
|
||||
- OQ2: OCR — **in**. `pdftotext -layout` first; scans `pdftoppm` + tesseract
|
||||
`eng+deu` (`bin/mail/ocr.go`, `internal/ocr`). No gocv, no gosseract CGO
|
||||
(D21 Zig owns Ladybug CGO). Optional `OCR_ENGINE=paddle` / compose profile
|
||||
@@ -186,4 +184,4 @@ Narrative: [docs/roadmap.md](docs/roadmap.md).
|
||||
| 4 | [#15](https://git.produktor.io/eSlider/2dph/issues/15) | **in** — lever/loop documented (`search` → `get` → `audit`). |
|
||||
| 5 | [#19](https://git.produktor.io/eSlider/2dph/issues/19) | **in** — CI recall SoT is `bin/brain/eval.go` via Zig. Python `bin/kb/eval` stays as an explicit fallback. |
|
||||
|
||||
Does **not** block epic close: OQ4. OCR [#6](https://git.produktor.io/eSlider/2dph/issues/6), OQ1 [#29](https://git.produktor.io/eSlider/2dph/issues/29), OQ3 [#30](https://git.produktor.io/eSlider/2dph/issues/30) are **in**.
|
||||
Does **not** block epic close: OQ1 [#29](https://git.produktor.io/eSlider/2dph/issues/29), OQ3 [#30](https://git.produktor.io/eSlider/2dph/issues/30), OQ4. OCR [#6](https://git.produktor.io/eSlider/2dph/issues/6) is **in**.
|
||||
+19
-46
@@ -1,15 +1,14 @@
|
||||
#!/usr/bin/env python3
|
||||
"""facts/audit - evidence & lexicon checks for the 2dph brain.
|
||||
|
||||
bin/facts/audit self # lexicon: docs + two-source rule
|
||||
bin/facts/audit db # evidence gate against var/kb.lbug
|
||||
bin/facts/audit contradict # D16 adjudication (JSON claim(s) on stdin)
|
||||
bin/facts/audit self # lexicon: every fact in db has >=2 sources
|
||||
bin/facts/audit db # evidence gate: run against var/kb.lbug
|
||||
|
||||
`self` mode checks the repo itself (no network, no runtime deps).
|
||||
`db` mode loads every Leaf with root=facts. Confirmed facts need ` x `;
|
||||
hypothesis contradictions need `a x b vs c x d` (both sides ≥2).
|
||||
`contradict` applies temporal_freshness then authority_pairing; ≥2 vs ≥2
|
||||
with no rule stays hypothesis / `(not confirmed)`.
|
||||
`self` mode checks the repo itself (no network, no runtime deps). It greps
|
||||
for known-good two-source pairings and confirms the docs are consistent.
|
||||
`db` mode loads every Leaf with root=facts and asserts each has source_rev
|
||||
and a non-empty `loc` (the "where did you see it" evidence pointer) and that
|
||||
'confirmed' facts carry a two-source `source` field.
|
||||
|
||||
Exit 0 = all checks pass, 1 = audit failures, 2 = could not evaluate.
|
||||
"""
|
||||
@@ -23,8 +22,6 @@ from pathlib import Path
|
||||
ROOT = Path(__file__).resolve().parents[2]
|
||||
sys.path.insert(0, str(ROOT / "bin" / "tools"))
|
||||
|
||||
from contradict import adjudicate, check_fact_row # noqa: E402
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def audit_db() -> list[str]:
|
||||
from kblib import connect
|
||||
@@ -36,8 +33,14 @@ def audit_db() -> list[str]:
|
||||
r = conn.execute("MATCH (l:Leaf {root:'facts'}) RETURN l.id, l.source, l.loc, l.how, l.confidence")
|
||||
problems: list[str] = []
|
||||
for lid, source, loc, how, conf in r.get_all():
|
||||
problems.extend(check_fact_row(str(lid), str(source or ""), str(loc or ""),
|
||||
str(how or ""), str(conf or "")))
|
||||
if conf != "confirmed":
|
||||
problems.append(f"{lid}: facts require confidence='confirmed', got '{conf}'")
|
||||
if not source or " x " not in source:
|
||||
problems.append(f"{lid}: needs 2-source evidence in source, got '{source}'")
|
||||
if not loc:
|
||||
problems.append(f"{lid}: missing loc (evidence pointer)")
|
||||
if not how:
|
||||
problems.append(f"{lid}: missing how")
|
||||
conn.close()
|
||||
db.close()
|
||||
return problems
|
||||
@@ -51,50 +54,20 @@ def audit_self() -> list[str]:
|
||||
problems.append("PLAN.md missing recall@5 gate")
|
||||
if re.search(r"(?i)facts must have.*2 sources|2.source", plan) is None:
|
||||
problems.append("PLAN.md missing the two-source evidence rule for facts")
|
||||
if "temporal_freshness" not in plan or "authority_pairing" not in plan:
|
||||
problems.append("PLAN.md missing D16 adjudication rules")
|
||||
if re.search(r"(?i)HNSW|BM25|deduction", (ROOT / "README.md").read_text()) is None:
|
||||
problems.append("README.md missing search/retrieval description")
|
||||
return problems
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def audit_contradict(raw: str) -> tuple[list[str], list[dict]]:
|
||||
raw = raw.strip()
|
||||
if not raw:
|
||||
return ["contradict: empty stdin (JSON claim or {claims:[...]})"], []
|
||||
try:
|
||||
payload = json.loads(raw)
|
||||
except json.JSONDecodeError as e:
|
||||
return [f"contradict: invalid JSON: {e}"], []
|
||||
if isinstance(payload, dict) and "claims" in payload:
|
||||
claims = list(payload.get("claims") or [])
|
||||
elif isinstance(payload, dict):
|
||||
claims = [payload]
|
||||
elif isinstance(payload, list):
|
||||
claims = payload
|
||||
else:
|
||||
return ["contradict: expected object or list"], []
|
||||
details = [adjudicate(c) for c in claims]
|
||||
return [], details
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def main(argv: list[str]) -> int:
|
||||
import argparse
|
||||
p = argparse.ArgumentParser(description="evidence & lexicon audit")
|
||||
p.add_argument("mode", choices=("self", "db", "contradict"))
|
||||
p.add_argument("mode", choices=("self", "db"))
|
||||
p.add_argument("--json", action="store_true")
|
||||
a = p.parse_args(argv)
|
||||
|
||||
details: list[dict] = []
|
||||
if a.mode == "self":
|
||||
problems = audit_self()
|
||||
elif a.mode == "db":
|
||||
problems = audit_db()
|
||||
else:
|
||||
problems, details = audit_contradict(sys.stdin.read())
|
||||
out: dict = {"mode": a.mode, "ok": not problems, "problems": problems}
|
||||
if details:
|
||||
out["contradictions"] = details
|
||||
problems = audit_self() if a.mode == "self" else audit_db()
|
||||
out = {"mode": a.mode, "ok": not problems, "problems": problems}
|
||||
if a.json:
|
||||
print(json.dumps(out, indent=2))
|
||||
else:
|
||||
@@ -104,4 +77,4 @@ def main(argv: list[str]) -> int:
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
if __name__ == "__main__":
|
||||
sys.exit(main(sys.argv[1:]))
|
||||
sys.exit(main(sys.argv[1:]))
|
||||
@@ -5,7 +5,6 @@
|
||||
//
|
||||
// ./bin/facts/audit.go self
|
||||
// ./bin/facts/audit.go db
|
||||
// ./bin/facts/audit.go contradict --json < claim.json
|
||||
//
|
||||
// Python bin/facts/audit is the implementation (CI runs it directly).
|
||||
// NOTE: never run `gofmt -w` on this file — it breaks the shebang.
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -1,103 +0,0 @@
|
||||
"""D16 contradiction adjudication (same rules as internal/facts)."""
|
||||
from __future__ import annotations
|
||||
|
||||
from typing import Any
|
||||
|
||||
CONF_CONFIRMED = "confirmed"
|
||||
CONF_HYPOTHESIS = "hypothesis"
|
||||
|
||||
RULE_UNRESOLVED = "unresolved"
|
||||
RULE_TEMPORAL = "temporal_freshness"
|
||||
RULE_AUTHORITY = "authority_pairing"
|
||||
RULE_TWO_SOURCE = "two_source"
|
||||
RULE_SINGLE = "single_source"
|
||||
|
||||
KIND_RUNTIME = "runtime"
|
||||
KIND_CONFIG = "config"
|
||||
KIND_NARRATIVE = "narrative"
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def _independent(sources: list[dict]) -> int:
|
||||
seen: set[str] = set()
|
||||
for i, s in enumerate(sources):
|
||||
sid = str(s.get("id") or "") or f"{s.get('kind', '')}#{i}"
|
||||
seen.add(sid)
|
||||
return len(seen)
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def _fresh_n(sources: list[dict]) -> int:
|
||||
return sum(1 for s in sources if not s.get("stale"))
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def _strong_n(sources: list[dict]) -> int:
|
||||
return sum(1 for s in sources if s.get("kind") in (KIND_RUNTIME, KIND_CONFIG))
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def adjudicate(claim: dict[str, Any]) -> dict[str, Any]:
|
||||
yes = list(claim.get("yes") or [])
|
||||
no = list(claim.get("no") or [])
|
||||
yes_n, no_n = _independent(yes), _independent(no)
|
||||
text = str(claim.get("text") or "")
|
||||
|
||||
def out(conf: str, rule: str, winner: str = "") -> dict[str, Any]:
|
||||
return {
|
||||
"text": text,
|
||||
"confidence": conf,
|
||||
"confirmed": conf == CONF_CONFIRMED,
|
||||
"rule": rule,
|
||||
"winner": winner,
|
||||
"yes": yes_n,
|
||||
"no": no_n,
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
if yes_n < 2 or no_n < 2:
|
||||
if yes_n >= 2:
|
||||
return out(CONF_CONFIRMED, RULE_TWO_SOURCE, "yes")
|
||||
if no_n >= 2:
|
||||
return out(CONF_CONFIRMED, RULE_TWO_SOURCE, "no")
|
||||
return out(CONF_HYPOTHESIS, RULE_SINGLE)
|
||||
yf, nf = _fresh_n(yes), _fresh_n(no)
|
||||
if yf >= 2 and nf < 2:
|
||||
return out(CONF_CONFIRMED, RULE_TEMPORAL, "yes")
|
||||
if nf >= 2 and yf < 2:
|
||||
return out(CONF_CONFIRMED, RULE_TEMPORAL, "no")
|
||||
ys, ns = _strong_n(yes), _strong_n(no)
|
||||
if ys >= 2 and ns < 2:
|
||||
return out(CONF_CONFIRMED, RULE_AUTHORITY, "yes")
|
||||
if ns >= 2 and ys < 2:
|
||||
return out(CONF_CONFIRMED, RULE_AUTHORITY, "no")
|
||||
return out(CONF_HYPOTHESIS, RULE_UNRESOLVED)
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def parse_source_field(source: str) -> tuple[str, str]:
|
||||
"""Split `a x b vs c x d` into (yes, no). Empty no if no ` vs `."""
|
||||
if " vs " not in source:
|
||||
return source, ""
|
||||
yes, _, no = source.partition(" vs ")
|
||||
return yes.strip(), no.strip()
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def check_fact_row(lid: str, source: str, loc: str, how: str, conf: str) -> list[str]:
|
||||
"""Lexicon checks for one facts leaf (no Ladybug)."""
|
||||
problems: list[str] = []
|
||||
src = source or ""
|
||||
if conf == CONF_CONFIRMED:
|
||||
if " vs " in src:
|
||||
problems.append(f"{lid}: confirmed fact cannot keep a vs-contradiction")
|
||||
if " x " not in src:
|
||||
problems.append(f"{lid}: needs 2-source evidence in source, got '{source}'")
|
||||
elif conf == CONF_HYPOTHESIS:
|
||||
yes, no = parse_source_field(src)
|
||||
if not no or " x " not in yes or " x " not in no:
|
||||
problems.append(
|
||||
f"{lid}: hypothesis contradiction needs 'a x b vs c x d', got '{source}'"
|
||||
)
|
||||
elif conf == "partial":
|
||||
pass
|
||||
else:
|
||||
problems.append(f"{lid}: unknown confidence '{conf}'")
|
||||
if not loc:
|
||||
problems.append(f"{lid}: missing loc (evidence pointer)")
|
||||
if not how:
|
||||
problems.append(f"{lid}: missing how")
|
||||
return problems
|
||||
@@ -127,22 +127,6 @@ class BinLayoutTest(unittest.TestCase):
|
||||
self.assertIn("cmdbin.ExecFile", text)
|
||||
self.assertIn(f"bin/facts/{method.removesuffix('.go')}", text)
|
||||
|
||||
def test_d16_adjudication_is_cgo_free(self) -> None:
|
||||
self.assertTrue((ROOT / "internal" / "facts" / "contradict.go").is_file())
|
||||
go = (ROOT / "internal" / "facts" / "contradict.go").read_text()
|
||||
py = (ROOT / "bin" / "tools" / "contradict.py").read_text()
|
||||
audit = (ROOT / "bin" / "facts" / "audit").read_text()
|
||||
for token in ("temporal_freshness", "authority_pairing", "unresolved"):
|
||||
self.assertIn(token, go)
|
||||
self.assertIn(token, py)
|
||||
self.assertIn("contradict", audit)
|
||||
self.assertIn(" vs ", py)
|
||||
plan = (ROOT / "PLAN.md").read_text()
|
||||
self.assertIn("temporal_freshness", plan)
|
||||
self.assertIn("authority_pairing", plan)
|
||||
shebang = (ROOT / "bin" / "facts" / "audit.go").read_text()
|
||||
self.assertIn("contradict", shebang)
|
||||
|
||||
def test_mail_import_is_shebang_not_brain_write(self) -> None:
|
||||
self._assert_shebang("bin/mail/import.go")
|
||||
index_mail = (ROOT / "bin" / "mail" / "index_mail").read_text()
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -1,104 +0,0 @@
|
||||
import os
|
||||
import sys
|
||||
import unittest
|
||||
|
||||
sys.path.insert(0, os.path.dirname(__file__))
|
||||
|
||||
from contradict import ( # noqa: E402
|
||||
RULE_AUTHORITY,
|
||||
RULE_SINGLE,
|
||||
RULE_TEMPORAL,
|
||||
RULE_TWO_SOURCE,
|
||||
RULE_UNRESOLVED,
|
||||
adjudicate,
|
||||
check_fact_row,
|
||||
parse_source_field,
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def src(i, kind, stale=False):
|
||||
return {"id": i, "kind": kind, "stale": stale}
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
class TestContradict(unittest.TestCase):
|
||||
def test_two_vs_two_stays_hypothesis(self):
|
||||
r = adjudicate({
|
||||
"text": "svc listens on 443",
|
||||
"yes": [src("docker-ps", "runtime"), src("compose", "config")],
|
||||
"no": [src("docker-old", "runtime"), src("compose-old", "config")],
|
||||
})
|
||||
self.assertFalse(r["confirmed"])
|
||||
self.assertEqual(r["rule"], RULE_UNRESOLVED)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(r["winner"], "")
|
||||
|
||||
def test_temporal_freshness(self):
|
||||
r = adjudicate({
|
||||
"text": "svc listens on 443",
|
||||
"yes": [src("docker-ps", "runtime"), src("compose", "config")],
|
||||
"no": [src("old-readme", "narrative", True), src("old-wiki", "narrative", True)],
|
||||
})
|
||||
self.assertTrue(r["confirmed"])
|
||||
self.assertEqual(r["rule"], RULE_TEMPORAL)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(r["winner"], "yes")
|
||||
|
||||
def test_authority_pairing(self):
|
||||
r = adjudicate({
|
||||
"text": "svc listens on 443",
|
||||
"yes": [src("docker-ps", "runtime"), src("compose", "config")],
|
||||
"no": [src("readme", "narrative"), src("wiki", "narrative")],
|
||||
})
|
||||
self.assertTrue(r["confirmed"])
|
||||
self.assertEqual(r["rule"], RULE_AUTHORITY)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(r["winner"], "yes")
|
||||
|
||||
def test_two_source_and_single(self):
|
||||
two = adjudicate({
|
||||
"text": "arc-1 runs Matrix",
|
||||
"yes": [src("compose", "config"), src("docker-ps", "runtime")],
|
||||
})
|
||||
self.assertTrue(two["confirmed"])
|
||||
self.assertEqual(two["rule"], RULE_TWO_SOURCE)
|
||||
one = adjudicate({"text": "maybe", "yes": [src("readme", "narrative")]})
|
||||
self.assertFalse(one["confirmed"])
|
||||
self.assertEqual(one["rule"], RULE_SINGLE)
|
||||
|
||||
def test_parse_source_field(self):
|
||||
yes, no = parse_source_field("docker ps x compose.yml vs old.md x wiki.md")
|
||||
self.assertIn(" x ", yes)
|
||||
self.assertIn(" x ", no)
|
||||
|
||||
def test_check_fact_row_allows_hypothesis_vs(self):
|
||||
p = check_fact_row(
|
||||
"L1", "a.md x b.md vs c.md x d.md", "var/", "audit", "hypothesis",
|
||||
)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(p, [])
|
||||
p = check_fact_row("L2", "a.md x b.md", "var/", "audit", "confirmed")
|
||||
self.assertEqual(p, [])
|
||||
p = check_fact_row("L3", "a.md x b.md vs c.md x d.md", "var/", "audit", "confirmed")
|
||||
self.assertTrue(any("vs-contradiction" in x for x in p))
|
||||
p = check_fact_row("L4", "only-one.md", "var/", "audit", "hypothesis")
|
||||
self.assertTrue(any("a x b vs" in x for x in p))
|
||||
|
||||
def test_audit_contradict_cli_unresolved(self):
|
||||
import json
|
||||
import subprocess
|
||||
from pathlib import Path
|
||||
root = Path(__file__).resolve().parents[2]
|
||||
payload = json.dumps({
|
||||
"text": "svc 443",
|
||||
"yes": [src("a", "runtime"), src("b", "config")],
|
||||
"no": [src("c", "runtime"), src("d", "config")],
|
||||
})
|
||||
proc = subprocess.run(
|
||||
[sys.executable, str(root / "bin" / "facts" / "audit"), "contradict", "--json"],
|
||||
input=payload, capture_output=True, text=True, check=False,
|
||||
)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(proc.returncode, 0, proc.stderr)
|
||||
out = json.loads(proc.stdout)
|
||||
self.assertTrue(out["ok"])
|
||||
self.assertEqual(out["contradictions"][0]["rule"], RULE_UNRESOLVED)
|
||||
self.assertFalse(out["contradictions"][0]["confirmed"])
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
if __name__ == "__main__":
|
||||
unittest.main()
|
||||
+1
-3
@@ -71,9 +71,7 @@ corpus HEAD.
|
||||
- C: narrative — READMEs, AGENTS.md, docs
|
||||
|
||||
Confirmed = A×B or B×C agreement. Single source = hypothesis + `(not confirmed)`.
|
||||
Conflicting pairings (≥2 yes vs ≥2 no) stay hypothesis until
|
||||
`temporal_freshness` or `authority_pairing` fires (`bin/facts/audit contradict`,
|
||||
[#29](https://git.produktor.io/eSlider/2dph/issues/29)).
|
||||
Conflicting pairings (≥2 yes vs ≥2 no) = hypothesis (OQ1 → v2 resolution).
|
||||
|
||||
## Read path
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
+4
-4
@@ -39,11 +39,11 @@ Epic [#16](https://git.produktor.io/eSlider/2dph/issues/16) closed.
|
||||
[#6](https://git.produktor.io/eSlider/2dph/issues/6) OCR — **in**.
|
||||
[#30](https://git.produktor.io/eSlider/2dph/issues/30) OQ3 duckdb-go — **in**.
|
||||
[#29](https://git.produktor.io/eSlider/2dph/issues/29) OQ1 contradiction
|
||||
resolution — **in** (`temporal_freshness`, `authority_pairing`).
|
||||
resolution.
|
||||
|
||||
## Blockers
|
||||
|
||||
None for epic #16 (closed). Remaining v2: OQ4.
|
||||
None for epic #16 (closed). Remaining v2: OQ1, OQ4.
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
question
|
||||
@@ -58,8 +58,8 @@ question
|
||||
|
||||
## Not v1
|
||||
|
||||
OQ4 YAML-first leafs.
|
||||
OCR (OQ2), duckdb-go (OQ3/D22), and D16 adjudication (OQ1) are in.
|
||||
OQ1 contradiction resolution, OQ4 YAML-first leafs.
|
||||
OCR (OQ2) and duckdb-go (OQ3/D22) are in.
|
||||
|
||||
## Close epic #16 when
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -19,35 +19,20 @@ type SecondSourceHit struct {
|
||||
|
||||
type WebFn func(query string) SecondSource
|
||||
|
||||
// ShouldEscalate is true when the default deduction path has no confirmed
|
||||
// facts hit. Hypothesis/partial facts are `(not confirmed)` (D16).
|
||||
// ShouldEscalate is true when the default deduction path has no facts hit.
|
||||
// `--root facts|info` is a single-root ask: do not mix in the web.
|
||||
func ShouldEscalate(hits []Hit, rootFilter string) bool {
|
||||
if rootFilter != "" {
|
||||
return false
|
||||
}
|
||||
for _, h := range hits {
|
||||
if ConfirmedFact(h) {
|
||||
if h.Root == "facts" {
|
||||
return false
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
return true
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// ConfirmedFact is a facts-root hit that is not hypothesis/partial.
|
||||
// Empty confidence is treated as confirmed (legacy leafs).
|
||||
func ConfirmedFact(h Hit) bool {
|
||||
if h.Root != "facts" {
|
||||
return false
|
||||
}
|
||||
switch h.Confidence {
|
||||
case "hypothesis", "partial":
|
||||
return false
|
||||
default:
|
||||
return true
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// Deduce returns the second-source block, or nil when web must not run.
|
||||
func Deduce(hits []Hit, query, rootFilter string, noWeb bool, web WebFn) *SecondSource {
|
||||
if noWeb || web == nil || !ShouldEscalate(hits, rootFilter) {
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -14,16 +14,6 @@ func TestShouldEscalateWhenNoFacts(t *testing.T) {
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
func TestShouldEscalateWhenHypothesisFacts(t *testing.T) {
|
||||
hyp := Hit{ID: "c", Root: "facts", Confidence: "hypothesis", Source: "a x b vs c x d"}
|
||||
if !ShouldEscalate([]Hit{hyp}, "") {
|
||||
t.Fatal("hypothesis facts are (not confirmed); escalate")
|
||||
}
|
||||
if ConfirmedFact(hyp) {
|
||||
t.Fatal("hypothesis is not confirmed")
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
func TestShouldNotEscalateWhenFactsConfirm(t *testing.T) {
|
||||
hits := []Hit{h("f", "facts", "docker ps x compose"), h("i", "info", "docs/a.md")}
|
||||
if ShouldEscalate(hits, "") {
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -3,10 +3,10 @@ package rank
|
||||
// BM25 ranks best-first, so the top hits are the *highest* scores; cosine
|
||||
// distance ranks best-first ascending. Both mirror kblib.py.
|
||||
const FTSStmt = "CALL QUERY_FTS_INDEX('Leaf', 'id', $q) " +
|
||||
"RETURN node.id, node.text, node.root, node.source, score, node.confidence ORDER BY score DESC LIMIT $n"
|
||||
"RETURN node.id, node.text, node.root, node.source, score ORDER BY score DESC LIMIT $n"
|
||||
|
||||
const VecStmt = "CALL QUERY_VECTOR_INDEX('Leaf', 'Leaf_vec', $q, $n) " +
|
||||
"RETURN node.id, node.text, node.root, node.source, distance, node.confidence ORDER BY distance LIMIT $n"
|
||||
"RETURN node.id, node.text, node.root, node.source, distance ORDER BY distance LIMIT $n"
|
||||
|
||||
// HopStmt is the Cypher walk from a search hit. Depth 1 = File, 2 = Commit, 3 = Person.
|
||||
func HopStmt(depth int) string {
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -16,14 +16,13 @@ type HopNode struct {
|
||||
|
||||
// Hit is one search result, mirroring the python script's dict shape.
|
||||
type Hit struct {
|
||||
ID string `json:"id"`
|
||||
Text string `json:"text"`
|
||||
Root string `json:"root"`
|
||||
Confidence string `json:"confidence,omitempty"`
|
||||
Source string `json:"-"`
|
||||
Score float64 `json:"score"`
|
||||
Snippet string `json:"snippet,omitempty"`
|
||||
Hops []HopNode `json:"hops,omitempty"`
|
||||
ID string `json:"id"`
|
||||
Text string `json:"text"`
|
||||
Root string `json:"root"`
|
||||
Source string `json:"-"`
|
||||
Score float64 `json:"score"`
|
||||
Snippet string `json:"snippet,omitempty"`
|
||||
Hops []HopNode `json:"hops,omitempty"`
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// rrfK dampens the contribution of low ranks; same constant as kblib.py.
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -172,7 +172,4 @@ func TestFTSQueryOrdersByScoreDescending(t *testing.T) {
|
||||
if !strings.Contains(FTSStmt, "ORDER BY score DESC") {
|
||||
t.Fatalf("FTS query must order by score DESC, got:\n%s", FTSStmt)
|
||||
}
|
||||
if !strings.Contains(FTSStmt, "node.confidence") {
|
||||
t.Fatal("FTS must return confidence for D16")
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
+13
-22
@@ -212,11 +212,7 @@ func rowsToHits(res *lbug.QueryResult) ([]Hit, error) {
|
||||
root := fmt.Sprint(vals[2])
|
||||
source := fmt.Sprint(vals[3])
|
||||
score := float64(vals[4].(float64))
|
||||
conf := ""
|
||||
if len(vals) >= 6 {
|
||||
conf = fmt.Sprint(vals[5])
|
||||
}
|
||||
hits = append(hits, Hit{ID: id, Text: text, Root: root, Source: source, Score: score, Confidence: conf})
|
||||
hits = append(hits, Hit{ID: id, Text: text, Root: root, Source: source, Score: score})
|
||||
}
|
||||
return hits, nil
|
||||
}
|
||||
@@ -231,26 +227,24 @@ type jsonOut struct {
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
type jsonHit struct {
|
||||
ID string `json:"id"`
|
||||
Text string `json:"text"`
|
||||
Root string `json:"root"`
|
||||
Confidence string `json:"confidence,omitempty"`
|
||||
Score float64 `json:"score"`
|
||||
Snippet string `json:"snippet,omitempty"`
|
||||
Hops []rank.HopNode `json:"hops,omitempty"`
|
||||
ID string `json:"id"`
|
||||
Text string `json:"text"`
|
||||
Root string `json:"root"`
|
||||
Score float64 `json:"score"`
|
||||
Snippet string `json:"snippet,omitempty"`
|
||||
Hops []rank.HopNode `json:"hops,omitempty"`
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
func toJSONOut(hits []Hit, query, rootFilter string, web *rank.SecondSource) *jsonOut {
|
||||
out := make([]jsonHit, len(hits))
|
||||
for i, h := range hits {
|
||||
out[i] = jsonHit{
|
||||
ID: h.ID,
|
||||
Text: h.Text,
|
||||
Root: h.Root,
|
||||
Confidence: h.Confidence,
|
||||
Score: h.Score,
|
||||
Snippet: h.Snippet,
|
||||
Hops: h.Hops,
|
||||
ID: h.ID,
|
||||
Text: h.Text,
|
||||
Root: h.Root,
|
||||
Score: h.Score,
|
||||
Snippet: h.Snippet,
|
||||
Hops: h.Hops,
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
return &jsonOut{
|
||||
@@ -271,9 +265,6 @@ func resultsToDicts(hits []Hit) []any {
|
||||
{"root", h.Root},
|
||||
{"score", h.Score},
|
||||
}
|
||||
if h.Confidence != "" {
|
||||
d = append(d, KV{"confidence", h.Confidence})
|
||||
}
|
||||
if h.Snippet != "" {
|
||||
d = append(d, KV{"snippet", h.Snippet})
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -1,120 +0,0 @@
|
||||
// Package facts is cgo-free evidence rules (D16 contradictions).
|
||||
package facts
|
||||
|
||||
import "strconv"
|
||||
|
||||
const (
|
||||
ConfConfirmed = "confirmed"
|
||||
ConfHypothesis = "hypothesis"
|
||||
|
||||
RuleUnresolved = "unresolved"
|
||||
RuleTemporalFreshness = "temporal_freshness"
|
||||
RuleAuthorityPairing = "authority_pairing"
|
||||
RuleTwoSource = "two_source"
|
||||
RuleSingleSource = "single_source"
|
||||
|
||||
KindRuntime = "runtime"
|
||||
KindConfig = "config"
|
||||
KindNarrative = "narrative"
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
// Source is one independent pointer on a yes or no side.
|
||||
type Source struct {
|
||||
ID string `json:"id"`
|
||||
Kind string `json:"kind"`
|
||||
When string `json:"when,omitempty"`
|
||||
Stale bool `json:"stale,omitempty"`
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// Claim is one assertion with yes/no evidence lists.
|
||||
type Claim struct {
|
||||
Text string `json:"text"`
|
||||
Yes []Source `json:"yes"`
|
||||
No []Source `json:"no"`
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// Result is audit output. Confirmed=false means `(not confirmed)`.
|
||||
type Result struct {
|
||||
Text string `json:"text"`
|
||||
Confidence string `json:"confidence"`
|
||||
Confirmed bool `json:"confirmed"`
|
||||
Rule string `json:"rule"`
|
||||
Winner string `json:"winner,omitempty"`
|
||||
YesN int `json:"yes"`
|
||||
NoN int `json:"no"`
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
func independent(ss []Source) int {
|
||||
seen := map[string]struct{}{}
|
||||
for i, s := range ss {
|
||||
id := s.ID
|
||||
if id == "" {
|
||||
id = s.Kind + "#" + strconv.Itoa(i)
|
||||
}
|
||||
seen[id] = struct{}{}
|
||||
}
|
||||
return len(seen)
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
func freshN(ss []Source) int {
|
||||
n := 0
|
||||
for _, s := range ss {
|
||||
if !s.Stale {
|
||||
n++
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
return n
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
func strongN(ss []Source) int {
|
||||
n := 0
|
||||
for _, s := range ss {
|
||||
if s.Kind == KindRuntime || s.Kind == KindConfig {
|
||||
n++
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
return n
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
func out(c Claim, conf, rule, winner string) Result {
|
||||
return Result{
|
||||
Text: c.Text,
|
||||
Confidence: conf,
|
||||
Confirmed: conf == ConfConfirmed,
|
||||
Rule: rule,
|
||||
Winner: winner,
|
||||
YesN: independent(c.Yes),
|
||||
NoN: independent(c.No),
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// Adjudicate applies D16: ≥2 yes vs ≥2 no stays hypothesis until a rule fires.
|
||||
// Order: temporal_freshness, then authority_pairing (A/B beats narrative C).
|
||||
func Adjudicate(c Claim) Result {
|
||||
yesN := independent(c.Yes)
|
||||
noN := independent(c.No)
|
||||
if yesN < 2 || noN < 2 {
|
||||
if yesN >= 2 {
|
||||
return out(c, ConfConfirmed, RuleTwoSource, "yes")
|
||||
}
|
||||
if noN >= 2 {
|
||||
return out(c, ConfConfirmed, RuleTwoSource, "no")
|
||||
}
|
||||
return out(c, ConfHypothesis, RuleSingleSource, "")
|
||||
}
|
||||
yf, nf := freshN(c.Yes), freshN(c.No)
|
||||
if yf >= 2 && nf < 2 {
|
||||
return out(c, ConfConfirmed, RuleTemporalFreshness, "yes")
|
||||
}
|
||||
if nf >= 2 && yf < 2 {
|
||||
return out(c, ConfConfirmed, RuleTemporalFreshness, "no")
|
||||
}
|
||||
ys, ns := strongN(c.Yes), strongN(c.No)
|
||||
if ys >= 2 && ns < 2 {
|
||||
return out(c, ConfConfirmed, RuleAuthorityPairing, "yes")
|
||||
}
|
||||
if ns >= 2 && ys < 2 {
|
||||
return out(c, ConfConfirmed, RuleAuthorityPairing, "no")
|
||||
}
|
||||
return out(c, ConfHypothesis, RuleUnresolved, "")
|
||||
}
|
||||
@@ -1,86 +0,0 @@
|
||||
package facts
|
||||
|
||||
import "testing"
|
||||
|
||||
func src(id, kind string, stale bool) Source {
|
||||
return Source{ID: id, Kind: kind, Stale: stale}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
func TestTwoVsTwoStaysHypothesis(t *testing.T) {
|
||||
c := Claim{
|
||||
Text: "svc listens on 443",
|
||||
Yes: []Source{
|
||||
src("docker-ps", KindRuntime, false),
|
||||
src("compose", KindConfig, false),
|
||||
},
|
||||
No: []Source{
|
||||
src("docker-ps-old", KindRuntime, false),
|
||||
src("compose-old", KindConfig, false),
|
||||
},
|
||||
}
|
||||
r := Adjudicate(c)
|
||||
if r.Confirmed || r.Confidence != ConfHypothesis || r.Rule != RuleUnresolved {
|
||||
t.Fatalf("2v2 must stay (not confirmed): %+v", r)
|
||||
}
|
||||
if r.Winner != "" {
|
||||
t.Fatalf("unresolved must not name a winner: %+v", r)
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
func TestTemporalFreshnessResolvesStaleSide(t *testing.T) {
|
||||
c := Claim{
|
||||
Text: "svc listens on 443",
|
||||
Yes: []Source{
|
||||
src("docker-ps", KindRuntime, false),
|
||||
src("compose", KindConfig, false),
|
||||
},
|
||||
No: []Source{
|
||||
src("old-readme", KindNarrative, true),
|
||||
src("old-wiki", KindNarrative, true),
|
||||
},
|
||||
}
|
||||
r := Adjudicate(c)
|
||||
if !r.Confirmed || r.Rule != RuleTemporalFreshness || r.Winner != "yes" {
|
||||
t.Fatalf("fresh yes vs stale no: %+v", r)
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
func TestAuthorityPairingBeatsNarrative(t *testing.T) {
|
||||
c := Claim{
|
||||
Text: "svc listens on 443",
|
||||
Yes: []Source{
|
||||
src("docker-ps", KindRuntime, false),
|
||||
src("compose", KindConfig, false),
|
||||
},
|
||||
No: []Source{
|
||||
src("readme", KindNarrative, false),
|
||||
src("wiki", KindNarrative, false),
|
||||
},
|
||||
}
|
||||
r := Adjudicate(c)
|
||||
if !r.Confirmed || r.Rule != RuleAuthorityPairing || r.Winner != "yes" {
|
||||
t.Fatalf("A×B vs C×C: %+v", r)
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
func TestTwoSourceYesIsConfirmed(t *testing.T) {
|
||||
c := Claim{
|
||||
Text: "arc-1 runs Matrix",
|
||||
Yes: []Source{
|
||||
src("compose", KindConfig, false),
|
||||
src("docker-ps", KindRuntime, false),
|
||||
},
|
||||
}
|
||||
r := Adjudicate(c)
|
||||
if !r.Confirmed || r.Rule != RuleTwoSource || r.Winner != "yes" {
|
||||
t.Fatalf("%+v", r)
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
func TestSingleSourceIsHypothesis(t *testing.T) {
|
||||
c := Claim{Text: "maybe", Yes: []Source{src("readme", KindNarrative, false)}}
|
||||
r := Adjudicate(c)
|
||||
if r.Confirmed || r.Rule != RuleSingleSource {
|
||||
t.Fatalf("%+v", r)
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
@@ -45,8 +45,6 @@ bin/brain/eval.go # recall@5 >= 0.95 gate (
|
||||
are not evidence of absence. `--root facts|info` and `--no-web` skip the web.
|
||||
- If recall looks wrong, run `bin/brain/eval.go`; it gates control questions and
|
||||
should stay at or above 95% recall@5.
|
||||
- Contradictions (≥2 yes vs ≥2 no) stay `(not confirmed)` until
|
||||
`bin/facts/audit contradict` fires `temporal_freshness` or `authority_pairing`.
|
||||
- Agents: `GET /openapi.json` and `POST /mcp` on `bin/brain/serve.go` (same
|
||||
handlers; tool names match paths `search`/`get`/`stats`/`audit`). Generated
|
||||
list: [tools.md](tools.md).
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user