feat: D16 adjudication — 2v2 stays hypothesis until a rule fires. (#35)

temporal_freshness then authority_pairing; unresolved keeps (not confirmed).
bin/facts/audit contradict. Gitea #29.

bin/facts/audit

@@ -1,14 +1,15 @@
 #!/usr/bin/env python3
 """facts/audit - evidence & lexicon checks for the 2dph brain.
 
-  bin/facts/audit self      # lexicon: every fact in db has >=2 sources
-  bin/facts/audit db        # evidence gate: run against var/kb.lbug
+  bin/facts/audit self         # lexicon: docs + two-source rule
+  bin/facts/audit db           # evidence gate against var/kb.lbug
+  bin/facts/audit contradict   # D16 adjudication (JSON claim(s) on stdin)
 
-`self` mode checks the repo itself (no network, no runtime deps). It greps
-for known-good two-source pairings and confirms the docs are consistent.
-`db` mode loads every Leaf with root=facts and asserts each has source_rev
-and a non-empty `loc` (the "where did you see it" evidence pointer) and that
-'confirmed' facts carry a two-source `source` field.
+`self` mode checks the repo itself (no network, no runtime deps).
+`db` mode loads every Leaf with root=facts. Confirmed facts need ` x `;
+hypothesis contradictions need `a x b vs c x d` (both sides ≥2).
+`contradict` applies temporal_freshness then authority_pairing; ≥2 vs ≥2
+with no rule stays hypothesis / `(not confirmed)`.
 
 Exit 0 = all checks pass, 1 = audit failures, 2 = could not evaluate.
 """
@@ -22,6 +23,8 @@ from pathlib import Path
 ROOT = Path(__file__).resolve().parents[2]
 sys.path.insert(0, str(ROOT / "bin" / "tools"))
 
+from contradict import adjudicate, check_fact_row  # noqa: E402
+
 
 def audit_db() -> list[str]:
     from kblib import connect
@@ -33,14 +36,8 @@ def audit_db() -> list[str]:
     r = conn.execute("MATCH (l:Leaf {root:'facts'}) RETURN l.id, l.source, l.loc, l.how, l.confidence")
     problems: list[str] = []
     for lid, source, loc, how, conf in r.get_all():
-        if conf != "confirmed":
-            problems.append(f"{lid}: facts require confidence='confirmed', got '{conf}'")
-        if not source or " x " not in source:
-            problems.append(f"{lid}: needs 2-source evidence in source, got '{source}'")
-        if not loc:
-            problems.append(f"{lid}: missing loc (evidence pointer)")
-        if not how:
-            problems.append(f"{lid}: missing how")
+        problems.extend(check_fact_row(str(lid), str(source or ""), str(loc or ""),
+                                       str(how or ""), str(conf or "")))
     conn.close()
     db.close()
     return problems
@@ -54,20 +51,50 @@ def audit_self() -> list[str]:
         problems.append("PLAN.md missing recall@5 gate")
     if re.search(r"(?i)facts must have.*2 sources|2.source", plan) is None:
         problems.append("PLAN.md missing the two-source evidence rule for facts")
+    if "temporal_freshness" not in plan or "authority_pairing" not in plan:
+        problems.append("PLAN.md missing D16 adjudication rules")
     if re.search(r"(?i)HNSW|BM25|deduction", (ROOT / "README.md").read_text()) is None:
         problems.append("README.md missing search/retrieval description")
     return problems
 
 
+def audit_contradict(raw: str) -> tuple[list[str], list[dict]]:
+    raw = raw.strip()
+    if not raw:
+        return ["contradict: empty stdin (JSON claim or {claims:[...]})"], []
+    try:
+        payload = json.loads(raw)
+    except json.JSONDecodeError as e:
+        return [f"contradict: invalid JSON: {e}"], []
+    if isinstance(payload, dict) and "claims" in payload:
+        claims = list(payload.get("claims") or [])
+    elif isinstance(payload, dict):
+        claims = [payload]
+    elif isinstance(payload, list):
+        claims = payload
+    else:
+        return ["contradict: expected object or list"], []
+    details = [adjudicate(c) for c in claims]
+    return [], details
+
+
 def main(argv: list[str]) -> int:
     import argparse
     p = argparse.ArgumentParser(description="evidence & lexicon audit")
-    p.add_argument("mode", choices=("self", "db"))
+    p.add_argument("mode", choices=("self", "db", "contradict"))
     p.add_argument("--json", action="store_true")
     a = p.parse_args(argv)
 
-    problems = audit_self() if a.mode == "self" else audit_db()
-    out = {"mode": a.mode, "ok": not problems, "problems": problems}
+    details: list[dict] = []
+    if a.mode == "self":
+        problems = audit_self()
+    elif a.mode == "db":
+        problems = audit_db()
+    else:
+        problems, details = audit_contradict(sys.stdin.read())
+    out: dict = {"mode": a.mode, "ok": not problems, "problems": problems}
+    if details:
+        out["contradictions"] = details
     if a.json:
         print(json.dumps(out, indent=2))
     else:
@@ -77,4 +104,4 @@ def main(argv: list[str]) -> int:
 
 
 if __name__ == "__main__":
-    sys.exit(main(sys.argv[1:]))
+    sys.exit(main(sys.argv[1:]))

bin/facts/audit.go

@@ -5,6 +5,7 @@
 //
 //	./bin/facts/audit.go self
 //	./bin/facts/audit.go db
+//	./bin/facts/audit.go contradict --json < claim.json
 //
 // Python bin/facts/audit is the implementation (CI runs it directly).
 // NOTE: never run `gofmt -w` on this file — it breaks the shebang.